Kelly Cherry featured in Read More #2

Our second installment of our newsletter publication, Read More, went out last week featuring this lovely poem by Kelly Cherry, republished from How To Read Music issue. Join our subscriber list for more writing from The Literary Review delivered to your inbox.
Sharon Harper Photography

Sharon Harper's extraordinary "Moon Studies No. 1" which appeared on the cover of our Spring 2010 issue, How To Read Music

Kelly Cherry
What the poet wishes to say

What the poet wishes to say cannot be said,
in part because it has been said, and often,
before, but this was true when only the second
poet wrote. It becomes no truer with time.

The bigger reason the poet cannot say
what she wishes to say is that she wishes to say
something that seems to be a kind of music,
a word-field of music, as it’s less a text
and more a space of time profoundly charged
by feeling, like the awe attendant to
our modest place among the huge events
of universal import: stars and novae,
the initiating burst of Many from
the One-the one what? Impacted point,
or god, or some computer-generated
simulacrum? In any case, the whole
of it.

If everyone could speak the whole,
then everyone would speak poetry, but
Moliere’s gentilhomme was perfectly pleased to learn
he had been speaking prose.

Even for those
whose language is poetry, the task requires
a life of: practice, contemplation, prayer.
(The latter two are sham without the first.)
This life begins in echo and extends
into apprenticeship, a period
that may be short or long but always ends,
if it ends, with the achievement of a vision
or “showing,” as Julian of Norwich called her visions
of Jesus Christ, but we prefer “a view.”
(Transported as we are by art and music,
the leap to faith remains a leap to faith.)
So say “a view,” a world view if you must,
but know that you are only halfway home.
Even with the view. Even speaking poetry.
Because poetry is not the only language
you must master. You must also learn
the personal language that will convey your view,
and since your view, so similar to the ones
you love, also differs from them, if only
because the time in which you live and write
is different, you must invent that language,
hoping a few readers follow on the same
path and perhaps they will and perhaps they won’t.
But how to make a language of your own?

In short, the process has to do with rhythm.
The racing rhymes of Dante’s terza rima
so magnifies the interlocking of
hell, earth, and heaven that the universe,
the medieval universe, becomes one verse.
And Chaucer’s Wife of Bath is like a laugh
so full and deep it shakes the ground of England.
And Will, whose way with words created English,
creates as well the tense, or rueful, clash
between the life of action and the life
within the skull, that secret, teeming world.

Or consider a poet less removed
in time, whose reputation for that reason
is hard to know, yet Osip Mandelstam,
arrested and in exile, begging food
and blankets, honed the razor of his lines.
Discussing Osip, poet Joseph Brodsky
notes, “Whatever a work of art consists of,
it runs to the finale which makes for its form
and denies resurrection.”

This is true
and not true, as it is, too, when he writes, “After
the last line of a poem, nothing follows
except literary criticism.”
Both statements are rather more clever than correct.
What follows a poem is often a poem in response.
It’s possible to write a poem that enacts
its own resurrection.

As for the poet,
the poet aims not at immortality
of self or reputation but of what
he or she wishes to say, the world as it was,
or seemed to be, on that day in mid-October
when the hills were still green, the wildflowers
scattered like birdseed from a hand not seen
nor felt, and the various, changing, falling leaves
swirled up again, caught in a sudden updraft,
then settled on the ground like immigrants,
a huddling, a community of color.
A day when a small boy rushed to open the door
to shout “Bonjour, Madame!” to a woman whom
he’d never met and waked in her a feeling
of sheerest joy, salvific and abiding.
The poet wishes to say what life was like
here on the planet in the twenty-first
disturbing century and might, to do
so, think of her beloved Beethoven,
who, deaf and lonely, brought his art to such
sublimity, it is as if he wrote
his music among the spheres of music, working
at a desk of sky, the innumerable stars for lighting,
a gust of solar wind sending manuscript
flying. In the late piano sonatas,
you hear the composer placing his notes, solid
and silken as they somehow manage to be,
without hesitation but with deliberateness
exactly where they are supposed to go,
thereby fixing the apparatus of heaven
God had let fall idle.

Kelly Cherry is the author of nineteen books, eight chapbooks, and two translations of classical plays. Girl in a Library: On Women Writers & the Writing Life and The Retreats of Thought: Poems were both published in 2009. She contributes to a collaborative poem in our forthcoming “Rat’s Nest” issue.
“What The Poet Wishes To Say” appeared in our Spring 2010 issue, How To Read Music.

Posted in TLR Contributors, TLR Poetry, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“Read More” Launches. We’re Story Pushers Now.

We Have The Answer To The Apocalypse…
Email!

Hello Friends,

Many you received a story by Robert Repino in your email boxes this week from us. If so, please accept my formal welcome to our first issue of Read More, a new publication of The Literary Review.

Read More is a newsless newsletter. Twice a month we will be sending you (if you like) selections of poetry or prose directly from the pages of TLR. In other words, we’d like to give you some literature to brighten the inbox clutter of headlines, coupons, events, bank statements, and listserve updates.

This is a little bit of a rogue idea, I know. I was reminded of that in particular this morning when a colleague from the IT department instructed me on the fine distinctions between a “push” communication and a “pull” communication. Obviously a mass email is a push communication—we are forcing stories and poems up0n you. A website (such as the one you are reading now) is a “pull,” whereby in various ways you are enticed to come to visit our website and if you so choose, while here, you can take advantage of some of our featured online content.

What we’d like to do with Read More, and with literature in general, is push and pull and publish by any and every means necessary. It’s a noisy chattering world out there online and in the supermarket and at the movie theater and in the bookstore. Our mission at The Literary Review is to publish and provide you with as much literary art as we can reasonably traffic (and keep the chatter to a minimum). We want to get the stories to the readers.

And so, we venture forward with this, another new TLR platform, to compliment our new ebooks, and new website, and the more ways now available to buy the physically beautiful print version of our magazine.

Thank you for being pulled to our website. If you’re interested in being pushed to as well, please sign up for Read More here:

All my best to you and thank you again for being part of TLR.

Minna Proctor
Editor

Posted in TLR News and Events | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Father’s Day Reading is for Wiseguys

DeNiro, Pesci, Liotta

Martin Scorscese's GOOD FELLAS

OUR NEW ISSUE, Emo, Meet Hole, features a terrific memoir by Anthony D’Aries, “The Language of Men.” Perfect timing for Father’s Day and …the opening of the summer blockbuster movie season. Read it.

We’ve also caught D’Aries live on tape: Anthony D’Aries reads from his memoir in progress at Randolph College.

Posted in TLR Contributors | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“This River: A Memoir” by James Brown, Reviewed by Duff Brenna

James Brown. This River: A Memoir. Counterpoint, 2011.

Reviewed by Duff Brenna, professor emeritus, California State University, San Marcos.

James Brown’s provocative, gut wrenching memoir illuminates a life rich in those elemental passions that govern our lives—anger, depression, fear of death, the hope for happiness, the cyclical nature of misery and despair, the transforming power of love. In the first chapter, “Talking to the Dead,” Brown looks back on the death of his two siblings, his sister Marilyn who took her own life at the age of forty; his brother Barry who killed himself at twenty-seven. It’s been several years since their deaths, but not a day passes that Brown doesn’t think about them. As he says in the opening pages, “I could be in the middle of a conference with a student at the college where I teach and it’ll flash on me, my brother, recoiling from the gunshot that took his life.” Or perhaps while driving home from work, his sister’s broken body “on the concrete bank of the Los Angeles River, her limbs twisted in all the wrong directions” will suddenly enter his mind. For years after their deaths, Marilyn and Barry have talked to him late at night. He loves them and is sometimes grateful to see them, but more often than not their presence will wake him and make him remember the horrors of their deaths. Afterwards, it will be impossible for him to sleep. He’ll thrash about in the grip of insomnia, trying to rid his mind of those images which always end up intensifying what has already been “a life-long depression.”

“Talking to the Dead” takes us on a journey through a considerably cursed sort of afterlife haunting Brown as he searches for a remedy to rid him of the “dark poem … and personal demons” that contribute to what doctors regard as the products of “a deeply disturbed mind.” From his teenage years and into manhood, Brown has been an alcoholic, a drug addict, an abuser of almost any chemical substance you can name—alcohol, meth, heroin, coke, steroids— so it comes naturally to him to search for relief from his troubles in the form of a pill, something legal (this time) that a doctor prescribes. He takes us step by step through the numerous drugs he has tried, explaining their side-effects—sky-rocketing blood pressure, blurry vision, slurred speech, a zombie-like exhaustion, an inability to concentrate. The flashbacks, the depressing dreams, the demons inside continue to raise havoc. There are many nights he wishes he could just die. But he has a wife and children whom he loves dearly, and so he fights to stay alive and become “… something more than a drunk, someone worth saving.”

In the chapter called “Blood and Duplicity,” Brown deepens our understanding of why he is who he is, how his past informs his self-destructive behavior. He writes about his eccentric, self-centered mother, a woman who was jailed as an arsonist, a woman who bankrupted her husband by forging his name to a document that allowed her to sell their home out from under them, so she could leave him and live high on the money. In “Blood and Duplicity” many years have passed and she has aged, has become an old lady with numerous aliments. There is no one to care for her except her last surviving son, who is, at best, ambivalent about her. What do you do with an ailing parent who has lived her life with little or no regard for anyone but herself? It’s a question Brown actually answers in the course of his narrative. It’s an answer that keeps him going, but I’m not sure that many readers would agree with or follow Brown’s way as he struggles to care for his mother, while also trying to maintain his sanity. It’s a moral dilemma described in devastating images that give us the son’s take on his mother’s failures, while simultaneously and unsparingly illustrating his own bottomless faults. By the end of the chapter, this reader wanted to tell the author, “You’re doing the best you can, Mr. Brown. Be kind to yourself.”

Cover of "This River: A Memoir" by James Brown

By and large, it’s always enlightening when a writer hits rewind and goes back to the beginning and pinpoints a dominant force which eventually took over his or her life. This is what happens in the chapter entitled “Instructions on the Use of Alcohol,” wherein Brown recalls his childhood. The memories start around the age of ten when his parents have a party and Brown sneaks a bottle of Midori, “a thick, syrupy green liquid,” into his room and drinks it and becomes “smarter and funnier and stronger and braver and even better looking,” before becoming deathly ill and passing out. Perhaps it’s not meant to be a humorous recollection, but I found myself chuckling and telling myself, “Yes, that’s kid thinking, yes, that’s the way it is.”

“Instructions on the Use of Alcohol” is a long chapter, moving from initiation to downfall (actually several downfalls) and then to Brown’s later years, when if he doesn’t quit drinking, he’ll certainly end up dying. The insight gained by Brown’s explanations of what was driving him makes this one of the most instructive chapters in the entire book and gives us a well-rooted basis for understanding the behavior he displays in the latter part of the memoir.

In “Remembering Linda,” Brown explores a period when the author was in his early teens and in love with a girl in high school. Her name was Linda Hernandez. She was in foster care, a throw away child having an affair with a man in his twenties. Linda was desperate for love and attention. Brown wanted to tell her that he loved her, but he was three years younger and not brave enough to make his feelings known. Any man remembering his own confusing adolescence will recognize and most likely sympathize with Brown’s teenage dilemma. Who doesn’t remember his/ her first love and how overwhelming it was?

Chapter follows chapter weaving the past into the present, the present into the past seamlessly as the author continues with what must have been at times an excruciating voyage of self-discovery, a voyage occasionally punctuated with moments of an uplifting epiphany. “The Apprentice” describes his closeness with and admiration for his father, a man who at sixty-seven was still repairing roofs and pouring concrete driveways and fixing bathrooms and sewer lines. This is a chapter that reveals the better angels of Brown’s nature. The subtext of what we see happening between Brown and his father says, in effect, that his childhood wasn’t unrelentingly dreadful. Those appalling early years were at least somewhat mitigated by the example of a father who taught him how to work hard and what manhood meant. Brown describes a father whose influence was powerful enough to move his stubborn son away from a labor-intensive career in construction towards the life of the mind. His father wants him in school, wants him to go to college. Brown says: “Part of me wants to break the cycle of the men in our family working the trades and be the first to attend college.” But at this point in his life (he’s seventeen), he just doesn’t believe he’s smart enough to be in college. His father vehemently disagrees and won’t sign the release form that would send his son to vocational school. “The Apprentice” makes clear that there were periodic blessings throughout what was too often a nearly unbearable life.

Blessings that Brown does his best to transfer to his own children, his two sons who accompany him to a river in Oregon, where Brown’s father had taken him as a child. He recreates the father’s careful instructions about how to fish for trout, how to use the reel, the line, the pole the little lead weights, how to bait the hook and where to cast it. Brown meticulously mentors his two sons, taking both comfort and great joy in teaching them what his father taught him: “How to pitch a tent. How to shoot a .22 rifle straight and true. How to string and tackle and bait a hook and where to throw your line for your best chances of catching a fish.” The title of the chapter is “This River,” the title of the memoir itself and the moral center of the book. It’s a chapter filled with love of family and nature. It speaks of the sacred trust handed down from fathers to sons, a duty that obligates us to remember the best of the past and to passing those good memories, our hard won knowledge, on to the next generation.

In a related chapter, Brown describes taking his boys to their wrestling matches and how well they fared on the mat. Brown, a former wrestler himself, is able to give his boy Nate a strategy to win a match in which he is two points behind in the closing seconds. Logan, the other son loses his match because his opponent cheats. In the heat of the aftermath, Brown and the cheater’s father almost come to blows. On the way home Brown feels uncomfortable about losing his temper. Reflecting on the day, he tells us: “I would like to believe that I can offer my sons a better world where there is no racism, no cheating. No parents who teach their children to hate and hurt others. But I can offer them no such thing.“ The wrestling chapter affirms what many thoughtful adults know: it’s a rough, tough world we live in and the best any of us can do is instruct our children in behaviors that might make them suffer less, behaviors that will help them survive the vicissitudes of a totally unpredictable life.

The final chapters reveal Brown’s obsession with bodybuilding and steroids, the use of which turned him into “Some Kind of Animal.” He gives us “Instructions on the Use of Herioin,” describing the process in minute detail. He also describes his attempts to kick the habit and his many relapses. He talks about his continual search for knowledge, his falling back two steps for every step forward, his writing and the degrees he earned which set him on a course to become what his father wanted him to become: a successful professional, an award-winning writer, a Professor of English at San Bernardino University.

This River pulls no punches—art shouldn’t and Brown doesn’t. The good, the bad, the ugly are all there, given to us in a lucid, uncluttered, muscular prose studded with an honesty that can only come from the deepest wells of a flawed man’s incredible willpower and courage. At the end of it all, Brown’s account becomes a story of a man who, against what should have been overwhelming odds, came back from the abyss and not only prevailed but triumphed.

-Duff Brenna

Duff Brenna

DUFF BRENNA is the author of six novels. He is the recipient of an AWP Award for Best Novel, a National Endowment for the Arts Award, a South Florida Sun-Sentinel Award for Favorite Book of the year, a Milwaukee Magazine Best Short Story of the Year Award, and a Pushcart Honorable Mention. His work has been translated into six languages. His short story, “Annette’s Work in Progress” is featured in the Winter 2010 issue, Machismo: A Field Guide.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

If only we’d read this submission sooner…

TLR recently accepted John McManus’ amazing story, “The Gnat Line,” but unfortunately we did not get to it in time (that’s the liability of reading slowly and carefully and slowly) and he told us that he’d already published it in storySouth. We love this story so much that we want everyone to read it. Follow the link to the storySouth website!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment